f0a655d794d80aa37281e90c6e99f592a970b93001d2caf8842b332e50896c55

f0a655d794d80aa37281e90c6e99f592a970b93001d2caf8842b332e50896c55
overall_rating 2.476190476190476 21

Forum thread for initial

[User added a rating.]

[User added a rating.]

I don’t think so, a bit hard, but playable, there are some interesting ideas.

Badly built, very frustrating hard gameplay (I’d say unfair).

[User added a rating.]

[User added a rating.]

i agree with xDDGx & Spirit.

[User added a rating.]

A bit ugly by today standards but in '96 it was decent enough looking. It’s a slaughtermap, so expect to save and load a lot. If you go in expecting that, it’s not too bad. A bit predictable sometimes (grab an object and instantly enemies appear) but there’s some alright combat (I liked the “1234” switch battle). Not terrible but not good by any means. 2/5

[User added a rating.]

[User added a rating.]

[User added a rating.]

Quite an enjoyable map. There’s not much room for movement, making dodging enemies quite difficult. It’s challenging, but in a good way. I thought it could use a bit more health pickups, until I found a secret just at the right time.

In terms of overall looks/atmosphere, I think my favourite rooms were the zombie pool and the Vore room. The 1234 horde room was cool too.

[User added a rating.]

[User added a rating.]

[User added a rating.]

Unregistered user “pmk” posted:

strangely constructed map with challenging gamplay. Okay to play through for a 1996 map. I would give the map a two out of rating for its intense combat scenarios.

[User added a rating.]

I’m glad I played this map despite the low ratings. I found it challenging in a good way. Unfair combat indeed, but that’s what survival horror games are about after all. Worth playing if you don’t mind the ugly looks.