Forum thread for mexx4
61c031b2d7bcf6e94b7f716d6cbf964fa29d07dcdedf59301c07524bb18b45be
overall_rating
3.555555555555556
19
A bit too boxy and squared, but the combat makes up for it. A bit non linear layout, with a number of traps.
The RA secret was simple, but quite good.
Forget about the traps and the RA secret comment, i was thinking about mexx5. If someone could get rid of the ‘‘traps’’ tag …
[User added a rating.]
Design is awful, gameplay is really interesting and hard, maybe, a bit easier than mexx3.
[User added a rating.]
i rather enjoyed the gameplay, though it is quite dark in many areas.
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
While not always much to look at–simple geometry and excessive darkness–this map offers some incredible action and intense fights and a few nasty traps, without ever feeling cheap.
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
It’s visually crude, with very plain textures and architecture, but the non-linear layout and non-stop combat make this a thrill to play.
[User added a rating.]
Pretty much agree with the others here. The only thing I have to add is that the secrets are pretty well placed and useful, but not very imaginative and they lack variation in how they’re discovered. (Found 3/4 secrets on my run.)
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
Unregistered user “pmk” posted:
This map has intense combat and is populated with a lot of monsters, however it is excessively dark and visually bland in design. Average map in which i would give this map a three out of five rating. Worth a quick play through noting more.
[User added a rating.]