Forum thread for bridges
e0d88aad3262da77f4cecfaa548dc7aaf3cbd78f820d33f004d48de1a459ab21
overall_rating
1.788888888888889
20
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
Well, what we can expect from beginner’s maps, which were created as tests for quake engine to learn level editing? Of course, not much:
- brstart — funny idea with turrets, but as start level this map is too uncomfortable; 2/5
- bridglnk — really pointless, only two portals without any messages and tips; although, there is nice lava logo on wall; 2/5
- brhiland — WHAT IS THAT?! — looks to experimental for me; 1/5
- bridge — most playable from these maps, the only one I have actually done… but why it’s so dark? And I’ve played it at night… 3/5
- watrways — too original for me… and also too dark. 2/5
Total score: 10/5=2
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
Bridges to the Highlands on The Quake Grave
I don’t normally like to speak ill of maps because people are putting their time into them and hopefully learning to become better mappers. It’s unfortunate that this pack is just not that great. I think there are 2 major problems here and one is the darkness of the maps. It’s really difficult to see where you’re going therefore making it difficult for you to progress. The other is the design voice/language. That is to say, when you build a map, you sort of want to communicate to the player, without actually saying it, how they should do things in your map. I felt this was all over the place.
As xDDGx pointed out above, in the first map you choose your difficulty, fair enough. Then the 2nd map sort of gives you an inkling as to what you’re going to expect from the rest of this pack. It’s dark and doesn’t really give you a chance to get your bearings straight. I found myself scrambling for the exit and I randomly found it.
Then it’s the waterways map. This map is the most fun as it had me sort of trying to figure out how to get to a good vantage point to take out the enemies. The problem is that it’s super dark and the enemies basically all see you at once so you don’t have a chance to plan your attack. It’s one of those maps that you’re frustrated with at first but then when you figure out how to do it, and it feels more rewarding. After that, you are in a room with 2 teleporters; one takes you to the next map, the other takes you…back to the waterways map. I found myself playing through waterways a few times before I got to proceed. This was very annoying! Why even do this?
The final map has you up really high on skinny platforms and after you take out the enemies, you have to jump on these tiny little specks and platform over to the exit. Why would you make someone platform on tiny little specks of environment? That’s awful to do to the player!
I would not recommend this pack, there isn’t much positive to take in. I feel as though the author maybe should’ve put all of these ideas into one map and added some lights.
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
This mini episode has some of the trolliest Quake maps I’ve ever played, right from the get-go: The text file dares the player to try the map in nightmare, but once you find the supposed nightmare selection path, you’re pitted against a horde of monsters, not the least of which being four shamblers.
It was actually kind of fun trying to beat the challenge of getting to choose nightmare, utilizing monster infighting as much as possible. The thing is, the map doesn’t even expect you to make it without cheating, so once you get through the portal, you’re thrown into a cage with you finally realizing the true purpose of those weird spike shooters: to punish you for being a dirty cheater (which I wasn’t). 
Then the trolling continues in the first proper map, where you have to deal with ornery stairs and are starved of ammo trying to survive enemies that ambush you from complete darkness, until you realize possibly too late you were supposed to avoid them in the first place. Being almost defenceless instills this feeling of panic, where you’re desperately trying to find a way out. It’s actually kind of cool; a little bit something different from your standard map.
The only architectural highlights would probably be the cool shadow casting lamps (probably because they were mostly the only things I could see in the first place!)
Come to think of it, I think the second proper map might have actually been my least favourite, maybe because it tried to be the most “normal” of the bunch, and failing at it: It was still kinda stingy on ammo and way too dark. The low ammo situation was still bearable, but the darkness ruined it for me.
Then comes that weird “bridge” level, the biggest troll of the bunch, where you very well could end up repeating the previous map for choosing the wrong teleporter. That’s just stupid. >:C
I kinda liked the last level. For one, it had more light (or at least the illusion of more light) and it was quite unique-looking. It was also quite forgiving about falling down. Even though I was able to focus hard enough in that platforming part without failing at it, I think it still requires too much accuracy for being very enjoyable.
[User added a rating.]
Unregistered user “pmk” posted:
worst of quake maps that i have ever played. Too dark, no cohesiveness to the levels and just incredibly difficult with bad design choices that were made during the creation of these maps. I give this 1996 quake map pack a one out of five rating and would not recommend others to bother playing this map pack.
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
[User added a rating.]
An early user created mini episode from 1996 that appears to be somebodies first set of Quake maps:
brstart - The starting map with 3 difficult settings to choose from
bridge - A bit too dark and ammo was too tight to where I had to relied on some infighting to save ammo
watrways - I found this a bit more fun than bridge but some parts of the map was still too dark
bridglnk - Really serves no purpose and the portal I pick took me back to watrways 
brhiland - Interesting experimental map with skinny walkways and some precise platforming near the exit
Conclusion: Its an interesting set of small experimental maps from 1996 but there were better ones out there from that time.
[User added a rating.]